The nations health service -
safe in the government's hands?
submitted by Gerry Ramsden.
"Total privatisation of the NHS is not on the
cards", words to placate the massed ranks of the public and
trade unionists alike that support a NHS, free at the point of use.
It would make me smile, if the situation wasn't so
serious. The National Health Service is now facing a threat, which
I couldn't have envisioned from a Labour government.
Moving one of the original anti-privatisation resolutions
at MSF conference all those years back, I think I have a little
grasp on the situation which has arose in the present day. Each
year it became necessary to re-iterate the same stance, strengthening
and re-defining the arguments which led trade unions to their present
position. Reflecting on privatisation of the NHS which has gone
on apace with building projects, Estate service contracts, Clinical
service contracts and now the proposed Logistics contracts.
I came to the conclusion that out and out privatisation
of services whilst having some threats to the workforce are a lot
less dangerous then the insidious mal-administration of PFI schemes
and contracts in addition to the bad financial accounting that is
rife throughout the system. Whilst the vast profits that are made
concern me, they don't concern me unduly. Waste, repetition of paperwork,
financial mismanagement and administrative incompetence loose more
value of the NHS than even the amount profit gained by PFI companies
and consortia. Illustrating this incompetence are the services that
have been paid for but not provided and a system that allows contractors
to defraud resources with what seems like impunity of detection.
Throughout all the re-organisations of the NHS, finance
has been and remains as the prime driver for change, not primarily
as a rationing of services, but a requirement to obtain "value
for money", "positive outcomes" and "win/win
situations".
Presently financial control of the NHS is like a corrupt
computer programme, you know the feeling, expert salespeople tell
you it works, it looks like it works, but then fails at the last
hurdle so you have to go back to the beginning, loosing everything
in the process. Then a realisation, it is the Department of Health's
accountants that control financial planning to the trusts therefore
the whole system needs to be re-examined. Since managers of the
NHS keep praising the concerted efforts made throughout the NHS
to curb costs, against the background increasing accumulated debts,
only one conclusion can be made: With a widespread growing accumulated
debt across the system, £1.4 billion pounds in the present
year I argue that the accepted financial management systems are
not up to the job.
At each re-organisation management structures change
but the individuals who occupy these important posts do not. Further,
generally the present incumbents of posts that control and plan
the financial systems for the NHS are also not fit for purpose.
The reasoning is they are wedded to a system that
has failed and continues to fail again and again.
In conclusion, what I propose is a re-birth of the
financial system of the NHS. If the money used for killing Iraqis,
innocent civilians and military personnel had been used for saving
lives rather then ending them, the accumulated debt could have been
paid four times over. Canceling this debt for all trust is a pre-requisite
for re-taking financial control of the NHS.
Private company finance ethic must be imported into
democratically accountable public services. Import the financial
skills nationally into the system, re-train and implement locally
but refuse to pay the extortionate consultant fees that are endemic
across the financial sector.
Democratic local accountability of the health services
within a geographical area must also be established, to make local
services accountable to local communities, one size fits all NHS
services do not work, and is fraught with complications.
The beginning of this process is to campaign for cancellation
of the NHS within the trade unions and also in the external political
communities.
|